Top Performing Decklists
| Deck | Creator | Record | Best Finish |
|---|---|---|---|
| Azorius Control | soto_ | 5-0 | 1st in MTGO Standard League #8949 |
| Azorius Control | _lluks_ | 9-1 | 1st in MTGO Standard Challenge 64 #12763203 |
| Azorius Control | andoru011120 | 4-1 | None |
| Azorius Control | _lluks_ | 5-2 | None |
| Azorius Control | _lluks_ | 5-2 | None |
Performance Stats (Last 14 Days)
Win Rate Impact
Top Table Win Rate
Meta Trend
Sample Size
Tournament Results
Average Copies
Archetypes Using This Card:
Azorius Control , Azorius Repurposing , Azorius Tempo , Bant Gearhulk , Boros Mice , Dimir Bounce , Dimir Midrange , Dimir Repurposing , Esper Paragon , Golgari Roots
Meta Performance Analysis
Dissection Tools ranks #309 out of approximately 339 cards in raw efficiency (top 91%).
Game Impact Factor
Color Differential
Colorless average: 54.3%
Performance compared to other Colorless cardsBased on our comprehensive multi-metric analysis, Dissection Tools is an underperforming card in the current meta.
Recommended number of copies: 1
Win Rate Timeline
Card Efficiency Analysis
Raw Efficiency (Win Rate/Mana)
Relative Efficiency
Performance Efficiency: 2.42 (Win rate × Top 8 rate ÷ Mana value)
At 5 mana, the average win rate in the format is 67.8%. Dissection Tools has a win rate of 60.5%, making it 10.7% worse than other 5-mana cards.
Top Performing Partners
| Card Name | Type | Deck Count | Win Rate | 1st Places |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Malicious Eclipse | Sorcery | 5 | 73.3% | 3 |
| Collector's Vault | Artifact | 7 | 61.9% | 3 |
| Cryptic Coat | Artifact — Equipment | 5 | 59.5% | 1 |
| The Mightstone and Weakstone | Legendary Artifact — Powerstone | 9 | 53.3% | 3 |
| The Stone Brain | Legendary Artifact | 8 | 47.9% | 5 |
| The Enigma Jewel | Legendary Artifact // Legendary Artifact | 10 | 43.3% | 3 |
| Simulacrum Synthesizer | Artifact | 10 | 43.3% | 3 |
| Repurposing Bay | Artifact | 10 | 43.3% | 3 |
| Thran Spider | Artifact Creature — Spider | 7 | 42.9% | 2 |
| Mazemind Tome | Artifact | 5 | 42.9% | 0 |
Card Synergy Analysis
Cards that perform better with Dissection Tools than they do on average. A positive synergy score indicates stronger performance together.
| Card Name | Type | Mana | Decks | Win Rate Together | Win Rate Apart | Synergy Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Obstinate Baloth | Creature — Beast | 4 | 7 | 68.8% | 64.6% | +4.2% |
| Wilt-Leaf Liege | Creature — Elf Knight | 4 | 9 | 66.1% | 64.3% | +1.8% |
| No More Lies | Instant | 2 | 10 | 65.5% | 64.0% | +1.5% |
| Three Steps Ahead | Instant | 1 | 9 | 67.3% | 66.4% | +0.9% |
| Sunfall | Sorcery | 5 | 9 | 66.0% | 65.2% | +0.8% |
| Tishana's Tidebinder | Creature — Merfolk Wizard | 3 | 10 | 65.6% | 65.1% | +0.5% |
| Rest in Peace | Enchantment | 2 | 12 | 64.1% | 64.1% | -0.0% |
| Ride's End | Instant | 5 | 11 | 64.1% | 64.4% | -0.4% |
| Overlord of the Mistmoors | Enchantment Creature — Avatar Horror | 7 | 11 | 62.5% | 63.0% | -0.5% |
| Beza, the Bounding Spring | Legendary Creature — Elemental Elk | 4 | 13 | 62.5% | 64.3% | -1.8% |
Top Archetypes
| Archetype | Deck Count | % of Archetype | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|
| Temur Otters | 149 | 44.5% | 36.8% |
| Azorius Control | 147 | 40.2% | 53.4% |
| Dimir Midrange | 19 | 0.9% | 35.3% |
| Unknown Archetype | 6 | 1.9% | 51.2% |
| Izzet Repurpose | 4 | 21.1% | 20.8% |
Statistics Explanation
| Statistic | Description | Formula |
|---|---|---|
| Win Rate Impact | How much this card increases or decreases the win rate of decks that include it, compared to the average deck in the format. | (Win rate of decks with this card) - (Average win rate of all decks) |
| Top Table Win Rate | A weighted win rate that gives more significance to performance in higher tournament placements. First place finishes count for 2x, with diminishing weight down to 8th place. | ∑(wins × placement_weight) / ∑((wins + losses) × placement_weight) |
| Meta Trend | Shows if the card is performing better or worse in the most recent period compared to earlier periods. Positive values indicate improving performance. | (Win rate in recent half of time period) - (Win rate in earlier half of time period) |
| Confidence Factor | A measure of statistical reliability based on sample size. The progress bar indicates how confident we are in the statistics (with larger sample sizes providing higher confidence). | log10(Number of decks + 1) |
| Average Copies | The average number of copies of this card included in decks that use it. | ∑(Copies in each deck) / (Number of decks) |
| Card Synergy Score | Measures how well this card performs with other cards compared to their individual performance. | (Win rate together) - (Average of individual win rates) |
| Raw Efficiency | Win rate points per mana invested. Higher values indicate better returns on mana investment. | (Win rate) / (Mana value) |
| Relative Efficiency | How efficient this card is compared to the average card of the same mana value. | ((Win rate) / (Format average win rate for same mana)) / (Mana value) |
| Performance Efficiency | Combined metric that accounts for win rate, tournament success, and mana investment. | (Win rate × Top 8 placement rate) / (Mana value) |
| Game Impact Factor | A measure of how much this card affects game outcomes, based on win rate adjusted by its deviation from the format average. | Win rate × (1 + (Win rate - Format average) / 100) |
| Color Differential | How this card's win rate compares to the average win rate of other cards of the same color. | Win rate - Average win rate for same color |
All statistics are calculated using tournament data from the selected time period. Sample sizes below 10 decks may not provide statistically significant results.